Independent Project Oversight Report (IPOR) Rating
-
- Satisfactory, no corrective action necessary.
-
- Caution, risks/issues exist. There may be a need for corrective action in the near future.
-
- Escalated for immediate corrective action. There is a significant risk to the health of the project.
-
- Not enough data is available to make a determination about the project health.
-
No Report Available - Indicates that a Report is not available for publishing for the reporting period.
4265-076 Future Disease Surveillance System Project (FDSS)
The CDPH proposes to procure a disease surveillance system to address operational inefficiencies associated with manual processes and lack of access to timely and complete data to perform local and statewide disease surveillance.
Project Details
| Agency / State Entity | Health and Human Services / Public Health, Department of |
|---|---|
| Total Cost | $45,848,096 |
| Last Approved Start Date | 04/01/2026 |
| Last Approved Finish Date | 09/30/2027 |
| Criticality Rating | Medium |
| IPOR Reporting Period | Overall IPOR Rating |
|---|---|
| 07/01/2026 - 07/31/2026 |
Independent Project Oversight Dashboard
Key Questions
Is the project on track to satisfy the customer's business objectives?Yes
Is the project on track to achieve the objectives in the approved timeframe?Yes
Is the project on track to achieve the objectives within the approved budget?No
| Project Overall Health | Comments |
|---|---|
| The project’s overall health is Green, as the project makes progress in the activities. • SI delivered 11 project deliverables for review and approval to CDPH in July. • Sprint 1 progressed despite the additional time required for environment setup. • SI progressed functional readiness, advanced OCM planning and data‑mapping work, and progressed technical activities including environment preparation, data‑migration planning, preparation, and validation. • The program is planning to re‑prioritize efforts to make additional funds available to support FDSS, as the approved BCP provided only $10,000,000 for FY 26/27. |
| Focus Area/Rating | Comments |
|---|---|
| Governance |
• This focus area is Green for this month as the project continued progress in planning and conducting Scrum ceremonies and Steering Committee meeting. • The first Executive Steering Committee meeting was held on July 30, 2026, and the cadence has now been set to monthly. • Sprint 1 was centered on environment setup, and delays and challenges in that work led to the functional stories being carried forward to Sprint 2. • Environment setup, an unplanned task, is being coordinated through a separate cross‑team stand‑up. • As this is the initial sprint, the team’s Agile practices and cadence to mature as the project progresses. |
| Time Management |
• The focus area is Yellow for July as there is 6 weeks environment setup delay to the project schedule and Go-Live impact is under review. • Sprint 1 concluded with 2 user stories completed; 14 user stories carried forward; DoD was not defined for infrastructure tasks; retrospective was not conducted. • Sprint 2 kick off planned for August 3, 2026 with 45 stories (17 functional, 28 technical) including carried forward. |
| Cost & Contract Management |
This focus area is Green. Cost: • For this period there are no expenditure concerns. • Project expenditure for July 2026, based on actual reported to date, are at 3.03% of the total approved project cost. • The project received $10,000,000 in the May Revision and program is planning to shift some priorities to using some of their other funds to execute FDSS project. Contract: For this period there are no concerns. • Contract amendment is in-progress with no cost or schedule impact following CDT’s approval of the Unified Platform Approach. The update replaces the requirement for hosting in a state data center using TMS Basic with hosting in the CDPH Hybrid Environment. |
| Scope Management |
• The focus area is Green with active involvement of program and business with SI. • Despite environment delays all new development and out-of-the-box (OOTB) user stories were reviewed and approved in product backlog and monthly cadence setup. • SI advanced functional readiness activities; progressed OCM planning and data‑mapping work; and moved forward with technical preparations including environment setup, data‑migration planning, preparation, and early validation tasks. • SI delivered the planned 11 deliverables in the reporting period. |
| Resources |
• The focus area is Green, based on the availability of the key resources needed at this stage of the project. |
| Quality |
• This focus area is Blue as the Coding has not started, hence there is not enough data available to assess quality health. |
| Risk And Issues |
• The focus area is Green under watch, and the project continues to monitor risks and issues. • The Environment readiness delays have impacted the project schedule by 6 weeks; mitigation efforts are underway with ITSD and analysis of impact to Go-Live date is in progress. • New risk identified: The data migration approach lacks full LHD buy‑in, creating potential operational complexities and schedule impacts. |
| Transition Readiness |
• The focus area is Green as transition readiness is identified as part of the SI vendor key deliverables and SI has weekly cadence setup. • SI has delivered the OCM Plan for review and approval with July deliverables. • Program has socialized the terms of reference for the OCM committees (Change Champions and Points of Contact), to the LHJ leadership. • Program has announced the new system official name as CalSURPH. |
| Conditions For Approval |
• There were no conditions for S4 approval. |
| Corrective Action |
• This area is Green as there are no corrective actions identified for this reporting period. |
Green
Yellow
Red
Blue