Independent Project Oversight Report (IPOR) Rating
-
- Satisfactory, no corrective action necessary.
-
- Caution, risks/issues exist. There may be a need for corrective action in the near future.
-
- Escalated for immediate corrective action. There is a significant risk to the health of the project.
-
- Not enough data is available to make a determination about the project health.
-
No Report Available - Indicates that a Report is not available for publishing for the reporting period.
7100-237 Document Management System (DMS)
The EDD has analyzed a variety of existing software solutions used for its existing imaging, data capture, electronic file submissions, document storage, and retrieval services infrastructure. The proposed vendor solutions must provide the capability to develop processes that are streamlined, scalable, and flexible for variable workloads. The solution features should support the deployment of new configurable, scalable, and robust software for imaging paper and electronic submissions as well as efficiently process defined business workflows. The DMS project will provide foundational capabilities necessary to support EDD modernization and GovOps Strike team recommendations.
Project Details
| Agency / State Entity | Labor and Workforce Development / Employment Development Department |
|---|---|
| Total Cost | $97,601,364 |
| Last Approved Start Date | 06/17/2024 |
| Last Approved Finish Date | 01/21/2027 |
| Criticality Rating | Medium |
| IPOR Reporting Period | Overall IPOR Rating |
|---|---|
| 06/01/2026 - 06/30/2026 |
Independent Project Oversight Dashboard
Key Questions
Is the project on track to satisfy the customer's business objectives?Yes
Is the project on track to achieve the objectives in the approved timeframe?No
Is the project on track to achieve the objectives within the approved budget?No
| Project Overall Health | Comments |
|---|---|
| The overall project status is Yellow for the following reasons: 1) As of June 30, the Change Request (CR) #6 remains under review. The work associated with CR#6 cannot be initiated until the CR#6 is approved and the contract amendment is finalized. 2) As of June 30, 2026, the Special Project Report (SPR) #1 was not completed. The contract amendment cannot be finalized until the SPR is approved. 3) Release of funds for CR#4 and CR#6 are dependent on the approval of the SPR and the contract amendment. If the funds are not available to initiate the development of the new requirements, the project could be further delayed. |
| Focus Area/Rating | Comments |
|---|---|
| Governance |
o The DMS project team appears to be following the processes outlined in the Governance Management Plan. o The DMS project team received approval for CR#4 from the Executive Working Group (EWG) and the Governance Escalation Group (GEG). |
| Time Management |
o There is a risk that additional funding may not be in place when needed to support the System Integrator’s Release 4 (Tax and Remittance “Part 2”) development activities. o Release 4 activities have been added into the schedule, however the project team still needs to analyze the downstream impact. o Release 4 activities have been resource loaded, however the resource assignments have not yet been fully analyzed to identify and resolve any resource overallocations. o The Project Schedule was analyzed using an industry-standard assessment tool and found to have several deficiencies, including negative lag, high total float, and invalid dates which impact the integrity of the schedule. The schedule did pass the Critical Path test. o The Project Team should conduct frequent schedule simulations, leveraging best-case, worst-case, and most-likely forecasts when schedule uncertainty exists. |
| Cost & Contract Management |
o A cost variance of $5.4 million exists between the approved baseline budget of $97.6 million and the June 2026 Project Status Report (PSR), which reports a total project budget of $103 Million. o The IPO Manager was informed that the project team plans to submit a Special Project Report (SPR) #1, including updated Financial Analysis Worksheets (FAW’s) by July 15, 2026, to support and justify the budget increase. o The June 2026 (PSR) indicates that the Technology Transition Support budget increased from $280K reported in May 2026 to $636K reported in June 2026 based on invoiced expenditures. The IPO Manager will meet with the Controllers team to review and discuss the increase. |
| Scope Management |
o On June 4, 2026, Change Request (CR) #4 was approved by the Executive Working Group (EWG), and on July 1, 2026, it was approved by the Governance Escalation Group (GEG). o As of June 30, 2026, Change Request (CR#6) has not been approved. |
| Resources |
o The project team appears to be following the processes outlined in the Schedule Management plan. |
| Quality |
o The IPO Manager recommended that the DMS project team perform a Root Cause Analysis of the Production defect and the emergency production fix implemented on June 27, 2026, to verify that all required testing, reviews, approvals, and deployment procedures were completed. o The IPO Manager is working with the DMS PM and SPOC to validate that the documented approval evidence exists for all testing iterations. o There are ten (10) open defects with workarounds carried forward from Release 1. |
| Risk And Issues |
o The project team appears to be following the processes outlined in the Risk and Issue Management plan. |
| Transition Readiness |
o The DMS Project Team should continue to prioritize technical knowledge transfer to ensure the State has the capability to independently operate, maintain, and support the DMS solution following the System Integrator's transition from the project. o The DMS technical team reported that it is gaining familiarity with the end-to-end business and technical processes. |
| Conditions For Approval |
All conditions for PAL Stage Gate approvals have been met. |
| Corrective Action |
Comments about Corrective Action Plan Items • N/A |
Green
Yellow
Red
Blue