Independent Project Oversight Report (IPOR) Rating
-
- Satisfactory, no corrective action necessary.
Green -
- Caution, risks/issues exist. There may be a need for corrective action in the near future.
Yellow -
- Escalated for immediate corrective action. There is a significant risk to the health of the project.
Red -
- Not enough data is available to make a determination about the project health.
Blue -
No Report Available - Indicates that a Report is not available for publishing for the reporting period.
1115-003 Cannabis Law Enforcement Activity Tracking System (CLEATS)
The Department of Cannabis Control (Department) seeks to transition to a more robust law enforcement activity tracking system. Currently, the Department must utilize a legacy law enforcement tracking system that is maintained and designed for the use of the Department of Consumer Affairs (DCA), which does not conduct law enforcement activity for the cannabis industry. The current system is utilized primarily for billing purposes, which is not the core business need of the Department. Additionally, the current DCA system used is based on older technology that presents maintenance and operations challenges.
Project Details
| Agency / State Entity | Business, Consumer Services, and Housing / Department of Cannabis Control |
|---|---|
| Total Cost | $2,556,053 |
| Last Approved Start Date | 03/04/2025 |
| Last Approved Finish Date | 03/03/2025 |
| Criticality Rating | Low |
| IPOR Reporting Period | Overall IPOR Rating |
|---|---|
| 05/01/2025 - 05/31/2025 |
Green
|
Independent Project Oversight Dashboard
Key Questions
Is the project on track to satisfy the customer's business objectives?Yes
Is the project on track to achieve the objectives in the approved timeframe?Yes
Is the project on track to achieve the objectives within the approved budget?Yes
| Project Overall Health | Comments |
|---|---|
|
Green
|
• The project team is effectively managing all focus areas and aligns with baseline project management plans. The vendor and DCC teams are collaborating effectively in support of the project. • The project is expected to be implemented 14 months earlier than expected. DCC is working on an SPR detailing the time and cost savings. |
| Focus Area/Rating | Comments |
|---|---|
| Governance Green
|
• The project roles and responsibilities are established and documented. • The team has scheduled all recurring meetings in support of the project and are following governance practices. • Project Steering Committee is established and meets monthly. |
| Time Management Green
|
• The project baseline schedule was developed with the vendor and was signed off by the Department during this reporting period. |
| Cost & Contract Management Green
|
• The project tracks monthly costs, and current expenses are within the planned budget amount. |
| Scope Management Green
|
• The project is aligned with approved project scope. • Scope and Requirement management plans are in place and followed. |
| Resources Green
|
• The project is actively managing its resources. • Appropriate resource management and contract management practices are being followed in accordance with the Resource Management section in master Project Management Plan. |
| Quality Green
|
• Quality control expectations and best practices are described in the Quality Management section of the Project Management Plan. Quality is a priority for this project to both DCC and Vendor teams, who have set up the tools that will be used to track quality. |
| Risk And Issues Green
|
• Project is holding weekly Risk and Issue meetings. • Project is following the Risk and Issue management as documented in the Risk and Issue plan. |
| Transition Readiness Blue
|
• Not enough information to make an assessment in this focus area. |
| Conditions For Approval Green
|
• No conditions for approval. |
| Corrective Action Green
|
• No corrective action plans in place. |
20250626 Release-16