Independent Project Oversight Report (IPOR) Rating
-
- Satisfactory, no corrective action necessary.
-
- Caution, risks/issues exist. There may be a need for corrective action in the near future.
-
- Escalated for immediate corrective action. There is a significant risk to the health of the project.
-
- Not enough data is available to make a determination about the project health.
-
No Report Available - Indicates that a Report is not available for publishing for the reporting period.
3600-081 Environmental Review and Permitting Project (ERPP)
The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) proposes to update the statewide online permitting systems, Environmental Permit Information Management System (EPIMS) and Scientific Collecting Permit Portal (SCPP). The scope will also include improving operational efficiency in management of environmental permits by supporting other critical Environmental Review processes including online application and tracking of California Endangered Species Act (CESA) Take Permits whose tracking platform known as Project Tracking is no longer supported. The goal of this project is to create one system that can incorporate these systems.
Project Details
| Agency / State Entity | Natural Resources / Fish and Wildlife, Department of |
|---|---|
| Total Cost | $13,317,754 |
| Last Approved Start Date | 01/07/2025 |
| Last Approved Finish Date | 01/06/2027 |
| Criticality Rating | Medium |
| IPOR Reporting Period | Overall IPOR Rating |
|---|---|
| 09/01/2026 - 09/30/2026 |
Independent Project Oversight Dashboard
Key Questions
Is the project on track to satisfy the customer's business objectives?Uncertain
Is the project on track to achieve the objectives in the approved timeframe?No
Is the project on track to achieve the objectives within the approved budget?Uncertain
| Project Overall Health | Comments |
|---|---|
| • As of September, the project pause that was initiated in January 2026 remains in effect until the vendor can deliver a realistic path forward. • Of the twenty-six tasks that need to be completed to lift the pause, one remains to be completed i.e. an updated schedule. • Once a realistic revised schedule is identified, the DFW will work to gain DFW executive approval, per the Project’s governance process and complete a SPR to submit to the CDT. • In September 2026, Sprint Goal: Permit #1 ITP Online Form, Global Search Functionality, Permit Wizard, Global Payment GUI screens was completed. |
| Focus Area/Rating | Comments |
|---|---|
| Governance |
• A Governance Structure has been agreed to and documented in the project planning process. • The Executive Steering Committee meeting was well attended by all stakeholders and DFW leadership. • The yellow rating is a result of an unknow date that a draft of the SPR will be provided to the CDT. |
| Time Management |
• The Project has an acceptable Schedule Management Plan. • Discovery activities for Permit #2 and #3 on hold until schedule is approved completed. • An updated project schedule has been delivered to DFW last month and continues to be refined. • The Project is now in the twenty-first month of execution and has not updated the Project schedule. |
| Cost & Contract Management |
• The Project has an acceptable Cost Management Plan and Contract Management Plan. • IPO has witnessed the Project executing and adhering to the Cost and Contract Management Plans. |
| Scope Management |
• The Project has an acceptable Scope Management Plan. • IPO will monitor the Project’s execution and adherence to the plan as the Project progresses. • The revised strategy should be analyzed using the approved Change Control Process for any impact to project scope. |
| Resources |
• Project management tasks and work are being completed within quality expectations and the approved budget. |
| Quality |
• IV&V is providing a monthly report and attending project meetings. • IPO has witnessed IV&V providing analysis and recommendations in the team meetings and monthly reports along with the Project embracing several recommendations. • The Project Management Plan contains a subsidiary Quality Management Plan that adequately describes the quality expectations of the Project. • Once all the pause conditions are met, this focus area can begin to transition towards green. |
| Risk And Issues |
• The Project has an acceptable Risk Management Plan. • The Project is using a Risk Issue Decision log for tracking and reporting status to Project stakeholders. • Risks and issues are not being discussed on a reoccurring basis in an open forum. |
| Transition Readiness |
• The Project has sufficient resources to support the Organizational Change Management (OCM) Plan and manage the change communications for the Project. |
| Conditions For Approval |
• A Special Project Report (SPR) is required pursuant to the State Administrative Manual section 4945. |
| Corrective Action |
• There are no corrective action plans in place. |
Green
Yellow
Red
Blue