Independent Project Oversight Report (IPOR) Rating
-
- Satisfactory, no corrective action necessary.
Green -
- Caution, risks/issues exist. There may be a need for corrective action in the near future.
Yellow -
- Escalated for immediate corrective action. There is a significant risk to the health of the project.
Red -
- Not enough data is available to make a determination about the project health.
Blue -
No Report Available - Indicates that a Report is not available for publishing for the reporting period.
3600-079 Wireless Digital Evidence Management System for ICCS (ICCS)
Testing, acquisition and deployment of 400 units of Body Worn and 400 units of In-car Camera System for The California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s Law Enforcement Division (LED). The use of body-worn and vehicle cameras has made law enforcement agencies more transparent and accountable to the public and has helped agencies evaluate and officer professionalism and training needs.
Project Details
| Agency / State Entity | Natural Resources / Fish and Wildlife, Department of |
|---|---|
| Total Cost | $7,107,050 |
| Last Approved Start Date | 07/21/2023 |
| Last Approved Finish Date | 12/06/2025 |
| Criticality Rating | Medium |
| IPOR Reporting Period | Overall IPOR Rating |
|---|---|
| 05/01/2025 - 05/31/2025 |
Green
|
Independent Project Oversight Dashboard
Key Questions
Is the project on track to satisfy the customer's business objectives?Yes
Is the project on track to achieve the objectives in the approved timeframe?Yes
Is the project on track to achieve the objectives within the approved budget?Yes
| Project Overall Health | Comments |
|---|---|
|
Green
|
• The Project Team has completed all camera installations and training activities. • The Project Team is working on finalizing documentation and designing SLA report format requirements with the vendor. |
| Focus Area/Rating | Comments |
|---|---|
| Governance Green
|
• Independent Project Oversight (IPO) has observed the Executive Steering Committee (ESC) reporting structure, that includes reporting on open risks and issues and the impact to the schedule operating as planned. • IPO is monitoring the ESC attendance and the time it takes to resolve critical issues as the Project moves forward. |
| Time Management Green
|
• The current schedule plans to complete the Project within the approved baseline end date. • IPO is monitoring the completion of the RTM, Solution Design and Maintenance and Operations Plans which are pending review and approval by the DFW. |
| Cost & Contract Management Yellow
|
• The Project’s Cost Management practices do not include forecasting staff workload to ensure that the current budget is adequate. • IPO made some recommendations as to how actual costs can be collected and forecasted. • DFW developed a method to track actual Project Team hours worked and expenditures; however, a method to track the remaining budgeted hours and cost is still in development. • IPO recommends updating the Contract Management Plan with a plan to track contractor performance measurements and change requests. |
| Scope Management Yellow
|
• Scope Management is covered in the approved Project Management Plan. • A high-level Decision Log that is incorporated into the Risk and Issue Log is currently being used to track decisions and changes. • IPO has observed that the formal Change Request documentation and analysis process as outlined in the Project Management Plan is not being followed. |
| Resources Green
|
• The Project’s methodology to manage human resources and staffing is not documented. IPO recommends identifying the DFW subject matter required skill sets and competencies for each team member along with an evaluation plan to assess the skills of new team members. Processes to approve and onboard additional resources should be included. • IPO has observed the project is functioning with adequate staff resources. |
| Quality Yellow
|
• A Quality Management Plan should be developed. The Project is at risk without key quality metrics, a methodology to measure, reporting thresholds and identification of roles and responsibilities as it relates to quality management. • The Project has used working sessions with the vendor, DFW and the Independ Validation and Verification consultant to improve the acceptability and content expectations in submitted deliverables; however, this concern will remain open until the documentation catches up with the schedule milestone dates. |
| Risk And Issues Green
|
• The Project has an approved Risk and Issue Management Plan. • IPO observed the Risk and Issue Log being updated on a regular basis. |
| Transition Readiness Green
|
• The Organizational Change Management (OCM) Plan was approved by the DFW stakeholders in October 2024. • DFW is currently maintaining the OCM Plan and executing the plan. |
| Conditions For Approval Green
|
• There are no conditions for approval in place |
| Corrective Action Green
|
• There are no corrective action plans in place. |
20250626 Release-16