The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), Safety and Enforcement Division, proposes to develop and implement enhancements to the Rail Safety and Security Information Management System (RSSIMS) to improve frequent updating of the high volume of rail crossing information.
Agency / State Entity | General Government / Public Utilities Commission |
---|---|
Total Cost | $13,462,520 |
Last Approved Start Date | 10/01/2021 |
Last Approved Finish Date | 10/28/2025 |
Criticality Rating | Medium |
IPOR Reporting Period | Overall IPOR Rating |
---|---|
10/01/2024 - 12/31/2024 |
Key Questions
Is the project on track to satisfy the customer's business objectives?No
Is the project on track to achieve the objectives in the approved timeframe?No
Is the project on track to achieve the objectives within the approved budget?Uncertain
Project Overall Health | Comments |
---|---|
The overall project health indicator remains red. The project has run into a problem with the quality of the products being delivered. The Maintenance and Operations (M&O) Plan and the manual for administrators needed additional work by CPUC. There was contention about the response time of the application that led to a delay in the project. IPO recommends CPUC establish a project schedule that will take the project to completion. This will allow CPUC to get commitments from the vendor on resources and times. It will be up to the vendor to propose dates that they can meet. This should happen before the end of the year. |
Focus Area/Rating | Comments |
---|---|
Governance |
The Executive Steering Committee (ESC) was active in resolving several issues this quarter. The Executive Steering Committee meets once a month, and more often if needed. |
Time Management |
The schedule is currently out of date. Phase One (1) consisted of the agreed upon Minimum Viable Product (MVP). The MVP went live on August 29, 2024. The project schedule submitted with the Special Project Report #3 (SPR3) needs to be updated to show new or existing tasks including new dates, and ensure they are reasonable for Phase two (2) and Phase three (3). The vendor’s participation is critical in developing the new schedule. Unfortunately, it is not a priority for them. |
Cost & Contract Management |
The project is currently under budget. Primarily due to the contract being deliverables based. Most of the pay points for the prime vendor are towards the end of the project and have not yet been hitting the budget. CPUC PMs have completed all Deliverable Expectation Documents (DED). |
Scope Management |
Two (2) change requests (CR) were approved this quarter by the ESC. |
Resources |
The project is fully resourced by state and vendor staff. |
Quality |
The primary deliverables are late. The three (3) primary plans that are outstanding are the Data Migration plan, Service Level Agreement (SLA), and Maintenance and Operations (M&O) plan. While the products were delivered, the CPUC had to rewrite one (1). The lack of application quality and consistency has been identified as a risk. The CDT recommends this risk be changed to an issue. |
Risk And Issues |
Risk Issue and Decision (RAID) meetings are held weekly. CPUC is following their risk and issue plans. Most risks are mitigated in a timely fashion. |
Transition Readiness |
The CPUC has a strong Organizational Change Management (OCM) Program and an assigned organizational change manager on this project. The manager is engaged and organized. The OCM activities are integrated into the project schedule. Having an active and engaged manager mitigates the risk of the user community not adopting the new system. Users and stakeholders are engaged and knowledgeable about what is going on. Additional training sessions were held. |
Conditions For Approval |
N/A |
Corrective Action |
N/A |
2025-02-07 - Release-11